<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for nortypig</title>
	<link>http://nortypig.com</link>
	<description>an experiential adventure</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoho by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-791</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Mmm I'm going to have to get around to playing with these project management applications. I've got holidays in a couple of weeks. Yes I've heard strong things about Wrike, too Greg.

I'm not sure what it would take for me to leave Basecamp with work and realigning everyone's access etc... I think to win over people in that space now you're really going to have to pull out a killer application. Offer me something that no other project management tool is even close to giving.

My needs are small at the moment though. Thanks for commenting Greg, appreciate the balance.

Could I peek into the question about the lack of flexibility (to save my own investigation probably)? Where is it lacking? What could they offer that would improve that?

Just curious. Yep I'll check out Wrike in a few weeks. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm I&#8217;m going to have to get around to playing with these project management applications. I&#8217;ve got holidays in a couple of weeks. Yes I&#8217;ve heard strong things about Wrike, too Greg.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what it would take for me to leave Basecamp with work and realigning everyone&#8217;s access etc&#8230; I think to win over people in that space now you&#8217;re really going to have to pull out a killer application. Offer me something that no other project management tool is even close to giving.</p>
<p>My needs are small at the moment though. Thanks for commenting Greg, appreciate the balance.</p>
<p>Could I peek into the question about the lack of flexibility (to save my own investigation probably)? Where is it lacking? What could they offer that would improve that?</p>
<p>Just curious. Yep I&#8217;ll check out Wrike in a few weeks. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoho by Greg</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-774</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I personally don't think Zoho is good in project management field. Their other apps are better. For project management I would recommend to take a look at &lt;a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wrike&lt;/a&gt;. It's got amazing flexibility that Zoho lacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally don&#8217;t think Zoho is good in project management field. Their other apps are better. For project management I would recommend to take a look at <a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow">Wrike</a>. It&#8217;s got amazing flexibility that Zoho lacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Projjex by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-766</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex, thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex, thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Projjex by Alex Glassey, Projjex CEO</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-765</link>
		<author>Alex Glassey, Projjex CEO</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-765</guid>
		<description>I'm the CEO of Projjex.  Thanks for the Projjex comments.  Some clarifications:

- we did not sponsor WWD in any way.  Their review of Projjex was spontaneous and was performed without any of our help.  It looks like they simply liked what they saw  :-)

- the issue of data protection is a good one and one that we've addressed head-on in our choice of hosting vendor, database design, security, back-up and disaster-recovery, etc.  We're also now starting to address it in our blogs and marketing as we think we've done a better job than some of our competition - even, bless their hearts, 37S.  Check out our latest blog entry for some additional discussion (http://projjexblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/just-how-important-is-ssl/).

- the issue of selling information is also a great topic, and one that is largely over-looked by many customers.  Good that you raise it.  Projjex absolutely does not and will not share/sell/give its customer data to anybody.  Period.

Thanks again for mentioning Projjex and for the debate.

Alex Glassey, CEO, Projjex Software Corporation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the CEO of Projjex.  Thanks for the Projjex comments.  Some clarifications:</p>
<p>- we did not sponsor WWD in any way.  Their review of Projjex was spontaneous and was performed without any of our help.  It looks like they simply liked what they saw  <img src='http://nortypig.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>- the issue of data protection is a good one and one that we&#8217;ve addressed head-on in our choice of hosting vendor, database design, security, back-up and disaster-recovery, etc.  We&#8217;re also now starting to address it in our blogs and marketing as we think we&#8217;ve done a better job than some of our competition - even, bless their hearts, 37S.  Check out our latest blog entry for some additional discussion (http://projjexblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/just-how-important-is-ssl/).</p>
<p>- the issue of selling information is also a great topic, and one that is largely over-looked by many customers.  Good that you raise it.  Projjex absolutely does not and will not share/sell/give its customer data to anybody.  Period.</p>
<p>Thanks again for mentioning Projjex and for the debate.</p>
<p>Alex Glassey, CEO, Projjex Software Corporation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter is Ditching Ruby on Rails by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/05/02/twitter-is-ditching-ruby-on-rails/#comment-661</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/05/02/twitter-is-ditching-ruby-on-rails/#comment-661</guid>
		<description>Interesting Alexis, thanks. I think this is why I mentioned industry gossip in the post. When the dust settles it will be interesting to see what they actually do though as so many mixed messages are out there.

Incidentally, that's never a really good space to be in for a company. Thanks again for posting the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Alexis, thanks. I think this is why I mentioned industry gossip in the post. When the dust settles it will be interesting to see what they actually do though as so many mixed messages are out there.</p>
<p>Incidentally, that&#8217;s never a really good space to be in for a company. Thanks again for posting the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter is Ditching Ruby on Rails by Alexis Perrier</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/05/02/twitter-is-ditching-ruby-on-rails/#comment-658</link>
		<author>Alexis Perrier</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/05/02/twitter-is-ditching-ruby-on-rails/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>No they are not ditching RoR. see
http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No they are not ditching RoR. see<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoho by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-649</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>I've been looking at Zoho for a while Arvind and that might be on the cards. You're definately strong in that space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at Zoho for a while Arvind and that might be on the cards. You&#8217;re definately strong in that space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Projjex by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-648</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>Yes I still like Bascecamp better Ethan. And when it comes to it the core reason will always come down to trust and that 37signals have long established a high bar of quality in my worldview even preceding Basecamp, when they were blogging in the earlier days.

Do WWD do sponsored links? I'm not sure, I definately wouldn't link to a sponsored link if I was aware. But yes I agree that's a useful tutorial and goes a long way to building that trust.

I also have that barrier of discomfort from moving software now, too. Even a few small projects already running in Basecamp would require effort to move, notification to everyone involved etc... so any move to new project management is perhaps not on the cards unless they come up with some "must have" feature (for example it would be handy to have video conferencing in there :) )

Also, when it involves project management we have to decide whether we trust this company enough to risk our own business and integrity with their possession of our information. They could onsell information we store, or monitor our converstations for commercial purposes. What country's privacy laws are applicable, for example.

I don't really write reviews on nortypig - that's more my other weblog's domain - but I do like to share out links to see if something is good. Like, for example, if someone emails me and says they really liked Projjex or Wrike.

Thanks for commenting Ethan, valid points. I hope it wasn't a sponsored article over on WWD, it would damage their credibility no end if that came to be the case. I get the impression they're more about giving exposure to software alternatives rather than fully testing and vouching for them. To write the article on Internet Redux you would have to interact with the software for some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I still like Bascecamp better Ethan. And when it comes to it the core reason will always come down to trust and that 37signals have long established a high bar of quality in my worldview even preceding Basecamp, when they were blogging in the earlier days.</p>
<p>Do WWD do sponsored links? I&#8217;m not sure, I definately wouldn&#8217;t link to a sponsored link if I was aware. But yes I agree that&#8217;s a useful tutorial and goes a long way to building that trust.</p>
<p>I also have that barrier of discomfort from moving software now, too. Even a few small projects already running in Basecamp would require effort to move, notification to everyone involved etc&#8230; so any move to new project management is perhaps not on the cards unless they come up with some &#8220;must have&#8221; feature (for example it would be handy to have video conferencing in there <img src='http://nortypig.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Also, when it involves project management we have to decide whether we trust this company enough to risk our own business and integrity with their possession of our information. They could onsell information we store, or monitor our converstations for commercial purposes. What country&#8217;s privacy laws are applicable, for example.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really write reviews on nortypig - that&#8217;s more my other weblog&#8217;s domain - but I do like to share out links to see if something is good. Like, for example, if someone emails me and says they really liked Projjex or Wrike.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting Ethan, valid points. I hope it wasn&#8217;t a sponsored article over on WWD, it would damage their credibility no end if that came to be the case. I get the impression they&#8217;re more about giving exposure to software alternatives rather than fully testing and vouching for them. To write the article on Internet Redux you would have to interact with the software for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zoho by Arvind</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-647</link>
		<author>Arvind</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/zoho/#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Steven : Thanks for taking note of Zoho Projects!  It has other advance capabilities like task dependency &#38; Gantt charts too.

Try the other Zoho apps as well :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven : Thanks for taking note of Zoho Projects!  It has other advance capabilities like task dependency &amp; Gantt charts too.</p>
<p>Try the other Zoho apps as well <img src='http://nortypig.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Projjex by Ethan Adams</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-637</link>
		<author>Ethan Adams</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/04/30/projjex/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>But you still like Basecamp better, don't you? I read the post on Web Worker Daily, but it looked like a sponsored one... Don't get me wrong, I don't think that the tool is bad, but I like when reviewers really share what they like and what they don't like about the tool. For example, I've liked this review of a Basecamp alternative http://www.internetredux.com/blog/?p=2127 and I feel that I trust it. Afterall &lt;a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wrike&lt;/a&gt; might be a better solution for me than Basecamp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you still like Basecamp better, don&#8217;t you? I read the post on Web Worker Daily, but it looked like a sponsored one&#8230; Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t think that the tool is bad, but I like when reviewers really share what they like and what they don&#8217;t like about the tool. For example, I&#8217;ve liked this review of a Basecamp alternative <a href="http://www.internetredux.com/blog/?p=2127" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetredux.com/blog/?p=2127</a> and I feel that I trust it. Afterall <a href="http://www.wrike.com" rel="nofollow">Wrike</a> might be a better solution for me than Basecamp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Power of Social Media by lewis</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/the-power-of-social-media/#comment-397</link>
		<author>lewis</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/the-power-of-social-media/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>there's a good dialogue between clay shirky and daniel goleman (author of emotional intelligence) that's available at morethansound.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a good dialogue between clay shirky and daniel goleman (author of emotional intelligence) that&#8217;s available at morethansound.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloaca Makes Art Poo by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/cloaca-makes-art-poo/#comment-378</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/cloaca-makes-art-poo/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Valid point mister poo :)

Its what always makes me a bit worried about using public library books, too. Sometimes that's the only place we can get away in the modern world.

That being said I'm not sure I'm evolved enough to provide one on a plate for a camera crew. Its a brilliant mechanism for showing school children how the digestive system works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valid point mister poo <img src='http://nortypig.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Its what always makes me a bit worried about using public library books, too. Sometimes that&#8217;s the only place we can get away in the modern world.</p>
<p>That being said I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m evolved enough to provide one on a plate for a camera crew. Its a brilliant mechanism for showing school children how the digestive system works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloaca Makes Art Poo by Mister Poo</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/cloaca-makes-art-poo/#comment-361</link>
		<author>Mister Poo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/27/cloaca-makes-art-poo/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Art is philosophy and the philosophical thing that unites us all is going for a poo. This is probably where we do most free-thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art is philosophy and the philosophical thing that unites us all is going for a poo. This is probably where we do most free-thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joel Spolsky on Interoperability by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/19/joel-spolsky-on-interoperability/#comment-297</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/19/joel-spolsky-on-interoperability/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Mmm I see your point Robby. I actually agree with everything in your article. By no solution I probably meant that pragmatists and idealists were not going to meet halfway on this one. Its like the HTML vs XHTML debate and so many others. And I have to confess I'm a standardista so I guess I'll never see the pragmatist side that well. I actually see that pragmatically MS also has to consider what the business effect long term of not moving toward FF and other more standards compliant browsers might do to its income. IBM was at the top of its game once and fell a long way fast. There aren't any guarantees on the browser front, a lot of organisations are moving to open source options and MS have to be taking that seriously. Its not enough to just say we have market share anymore. I hope they have realised that even in the pragmatic camp.

Its a hard question - the web's ability to be every person's easy publishing platform versus its need for quality authoring. And in between there are the wysiwyg graphic designers who just don't want to know HTML but make a living at it anyway.

The key ultimately will have a lot to do with robust software solutions that allow every person to author AND produce high quality code. But for the current IE8 discussion the reality is that this hodge podge web of rubbish sites and accomodating browsers is probably here for a good time yet. At least until content management gets a lot more user robust lol.

Nice article Robby. Thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm I see your point Robby. I actually agree with everything in your article. By no solution I probably meant that pragmatists and idealists were not going to meet halfway on this one. Its like the HTML vs XHTML debate and so many others. And I have to confess I&#8217;m a standardista so I guess I&#8217;ll never see the pragmatist side that well. I actually see that pragmatically MS also has to consider what the business effect long term of not moving toward FF and other more standards compliant browsers might do to its income. IBM was at the top of its game once and fell a long way fast. There aren&#8217;t any guarantees on the browser front, a lot of organisations are moving to open source options and MS have to be taking that seriously. Its not enough to just say we have market share anymore. I hope they have realised that even in the pragmatic camp.</p>
<p>Its a hard question - the web&#8217;s ability to be every person&#8217;s easy publishing platform versus its need for quality authoring. And in between there are the wysiwyg graphic designers who just don&#8217;t want to know HTML but make a living at it anyway.</p>
<p>The key ultimately will have a lot to do with robust software solutions that allow every person to author AND produce high quality code. But for the current IE8 discussion the reality is that this hodge podge web of rubbish sites and accomodating browsers is probably here for a good time yet. At least until content management gets a lot more user robust lol.</p>
<p>Nice article Robby. Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joel Spolsky on Interoperability by Robby Slaughter</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/19/joel-spolsky-on-interoperability/#comment-283</link>
		<author>Robby Slaughter</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/19/joel-spolsky-on-interoperability/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Are you sure there's no solution? Joel characterizes the problem as having two sides: standardists versus pragmatists, but the reality is that the idealists want us to adhere to a standard that really is vague and unimplementable, and the pragmatists want to find a way to continue to interpret impossibly ugly HTML code. Postel's law implores us not to choose either side, but to select a feasible standard and be firm in implementation. That's a solution, not a stalemate.

More at: http://www.robbyslaughter.com/blog/?2008-03-21</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure there&#8217;s no solution? Joel characterizes the problem as having two sides: standardists versus pragmatists, but the reality is that the idealists want us to adhere to a standard that really is vague and unimplementable, and the pragmatists want to find a way to continue to interpret impossibly ugly HTML code. Postel&#8217;s law implores us not to choose either side, but to select a feasible standard and be firm in implementation. That&#8217;s a solution, not a stalemate.</p>
<p>More at: <a href="http://www.robbyslaughter.com/blog/?2008-03-21" rel="nofollow">http://www.robbyslaughter.com/blog/?2008-03-21</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bigger Monitors Equal More Productivity by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/12/bigger-monitors-equal-more-productivity/#comment-158</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/12/bigger-monitors-equal-more-productivity/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>True Mary. There are a lot of great time savers out there. I do wonder though when you look at large organisation IT departments screaming budget over 17 inch monitors and denying the larger monitors. In the end the increase in productivity could possibly justify the expense.

I've moved this year to a 22 inch LCD and a 17 inch (my old monitor) CRT. My productivity and efficiency have dramatically improved. So much so that when I move to a single 17 inch CRT or the laptop here I feel stifled.

But you're right. Its becoming a lot about online applications and increases in efficiency brought about by new ways of doing things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True Mary. There are a lot of great time savers out there. I do wonder though when you look at large organisation IT departments screaming budget over 17 inch monitors and denying the larger monitors. In the end the increase in productivity could possibly justify the expense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve moved this year to a 22 inch LCD and a 17 inch (my old monitor) CRT. My productivity and efficiency have dramatically improved. So much so that when I move to a single 17 inch CRT or the laptop here I feel stifled.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right. Its becoming a lot about online applications and increases in efficiency brought about by new ways of doing things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bigger Monitors Equal More Productivity by Mary St.James</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/12/bigger-monitors-equal-more-productivity/#comment-140</link>
		<author>Mary St.James</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/03/12/bigger-monitors-equal-more-productivity/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Curious fact indeed! But I still think that bigger monitors are not the only time savers. Today there're lots of Web-based tools, that can help you save hours. Take Google calendar, for example, or this great project management service called Wrike [http://www.wrike.com/]. My team now spends 30% less time, trying to digg through their emails in search for the information needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious fact indeed! But I still think that bigger monitors are not the only time savers. Today there&#8217;re lots of Web-based tools, that can help you save hours. Take Google calendar, for example, or this great project management service called Wrike [http://www.wrike.com/]. My team now spends 30% less time, trying to digg through their emails in search for the information needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Molly Holzschlag Interview by Roger Hudson Interviews Molly Holzschlag on camera</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/28/molly-holzschlag-interview/#comment-79</link>
		<author>Roger Hudson Interviews Molly Holzschlag on camera</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/28/molly-holzschlag-interview/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via : Molly Holzschlag Interview.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Via : Molly Holzschlag Interview.] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Searches on Google by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/25/iphone-searches-on-google/#comment-57</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/25/iphone-searches-on-google/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>True at the current point in time bandwidth is an issue. But we are coming into an era when theoretical bandwidth won't be our issue - the evolution towards G4 technologies.

Also, infrastructure may well be driven by the economics of demand.

But mostly, I think regardless of how much of a critical mass of users go into the mobile space a small percent is a lot of potential customers. If simply not providing for a small screen is going to lock your client's customers out - on PDA for example - then its doing them a disservice. The paradigm of a desktop user as the norm is shifting so I don't think its wise at all to develop just for desktop. I'd strongly suggest also that the web is global, your customers in many cases will be outside India. Therefore making sites which can evolve painlessly into this space is going to be more beneficial to you.

Even if that just means making sure your site works at 300px or less width, or doesn't max out at full screen width on a 22 inch screen.

But you're right about the bandwidth (perhaps in India) and the cost to consumers of mobile internet activity. Cameron Moll's book Mobile Web Design has a good overview of the options available for mobile development.

http://mobilewebbook.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True at the current point in time bandwidth is an issue. But we are coming into an era when theoretical bandwidth won&#8217;t be our issue - the evolution towards G4 technologies.</p>
<p>Also, infrastructure may well be driven by the economics of demand.</p>
<p>But mostly, I think regardless of how much of a critical mass of users go into the mobile space a small percent is a lot of potential customers. If simply not providing for a small screen is going to lock your client&#8217;s customers out - on PDA for example - then its doing them a disservice. The paradigm of a desktop user as the norm is shifting so I don&#8217;t think its wise at all to develop just for desktop. I&#8217;d strongly suggest also that the web is global, your customers in many cases will be outside India. Therefore making sites which can evolve painlessly into this space is going to be more beneficial to you.</p>
<p>Even if that just means making sure your site works at 300px or less width, or doesn&#8217;t max out at full screen width on a 22 inch screen.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right about the bandwidth (perhaps in India) and the cost to consumers of mobile internet activity. Cameron Moll&#8217;s book Mobile Web Design has a good overview of the options available for mobile development.</p>
<p><a href="http://mobilewebbook.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mobilewebbook.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone Searches on Google by Web Developer</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/25/iphone-searches-on-google/#comment-52</link>
		<author>Web Developer</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/25/iphone-searches-on-google/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Even if a mobile website is coded using the most strictest standards etc, It is just too slow to be accessed via a mobile network(atleast in INDIA) so unless something really radical happens to speed up the browsing, It is still a pipe dream</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if a mobile website is coded using the most strictest standards etc, It is just too slow to be accessed via a mobile network(atleast in INDIA) so unless something really radical happens to speed up the browsing, It is still a pipe dream</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Your Type? by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/15/whats-your-type/#comment-13</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/15/whats-your-type/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Ahh and I was hoping to get a cool Helvetica - although that would have meant I needed to fib on the questions. Integrity made me STENCIL.

Cheers and thanks for the bit of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh and I was hoping to get a cool Helvetica - although that would have meant I needed to fib on the questions. Integrity made me STENCIL.</p>
<p>Cheers and thanks for the bit of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Your Type? by JimK</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/15/whats-your-type/#comment-12</link>
		<author>JimK</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/15/whats-your-type/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I've always thought of my self as more of an American Typewriter kinda guy. Glad that you enjoyed the game. Thanks for stopping by the Extensis blog!

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought of my self as more of an American Typewriter kinda guy. Glad that you enjoyed the game. Thanks for stopping by the Extensis blog!</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-10</link>
		<author>Jermayn Parker</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Yeah im still going with paragraphs (for now)

I would be interested to hear your response of how using breaks turned out!

Interesting you mention StyleSheets being turned off, I think breaks and paragraphs would still look ok but lists would look funny with the bullets and other default styles being used!

Another point is that: breaks would even use less code than paragraphs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah im still going with paragraphs (for now)</p>
<p>I would be interested to hear your response of how using breaks turned out!</p>
<p>Interesting you mention StyleSheets being turned off, I think breaks and paragraphs would still look ok but lists would look funny with the bullets and other default styles being used!</p>
<p>Another point is that: breaks would even use less code than paragraphs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-8</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>True but I think it all falls back not on whether list, p or br is the element meant to handle forms - the issue is that nothing is really meant to do the job so we choose one of the three.

I started off using p but then as time moved on I tended to use lists - it felt more comfortable in my head as a list of form elements than a number of small paragraphs... so you can see where I'm coming from. Neither is really correct.

On the latest job I'm working on at the moment I've decided to use breaks as Mike suggested - simply because without CSS I can still have the form look structured. And, to be honest, I'm thinking br is a small price to pay but I'll see how it pans out before I commit. Its almost too simple.

Also, considering what some people do with extra clearing divs and other superfluous markup I don't think 4 extra br elements on the contact page is going to break the semantic idea of quality markup.

I guess to each their own. I prefer p to ul for 'plain ease' of styling forms though. True. I guess one could just place them all into spans though...

Are you still going with paragraphs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but I think it all falls back not on whether list, p or br is the element meant to handle forms - the issue is that nothing is really meant to do the job so we choose one of the three.</p>
<p>I started off using p but then as time moved on I tended to use lists - it felt more comfortable in my head as a list of form elements than a number of small paragraphs&#8230; so you can see where I&#8217;m coming from. Neither is really correct.</p>
<p>On the latest job I&#8217;m working on at the moment I&#8217;ve decided to use breaks as Mike suggested - simply because without CSS I can still have the form look structured. And, to be honest, I&#8217;m thinking br is a small price to pay but I&#8217;ll see how it pans out before I commit. Its almost too simple.</p>
<p>Also, considering what some people do with extra clearing divs and other superfluous markup I don&#8217;t think 4 extra br elements on the contact page is going to break the semantic idea of quality markup.</p>
<p>I guess to each their own. I prefer p to ul for &#8216;plain ease&#8217; of styling forms though. True. I guess one could just place them all into spans though&#8230;</p>
<p>Are you still going with paragraphs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-7</link>
		<author>Jermayn Parker</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>BUT what positive does using a list have over using a p?

I personally find p easier to style than li which has the ul/ ol and li elements were p does not have any child elements...

btw im re-reading Mikes article on using breaks instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT what positive does using a list have over using a p?</p>
<p>I personally find p easier to style than li which has the ul/ ol and li elements were p does not have any child elements&#8230;</p>
<p>btw im re-reading Mikes article on using breaks instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-4</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Mathew Pennell of the Watchmaker Project put up an interesting comment on the Web Standards Group Mailing List regarding this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Developers should also be aware of the way in which assistive technology such as screenreaders interacts for forms, specifically the forms mode that many have, where only form-related elements will be read out - this means that paragraphs of text and headings may not be available to screenreader users.&lt;cite&gt;Mathew Pennell&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting discussion on it can be read in the WSG archives on the &lt;a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg32998.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Styling Forms&lt;/a&gt; thread. Thierry Koblentz's take on using the br element (Mike Cherim agrees) and Mike Cherim's upcoming article on Screenreaders and form elements styling are worth looking into.

Personally I uses unordered lists, I wrap the label around the fieldname and not around the entire input... but there you go. Interesting how these things pan out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew Pennell of the Watchmaker Project put up an interesting comment on the Web Standards Group Mailing List regarding this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Developers should also be aware of the way in which assistive technology such as screenreaders interacts for forms, specifically the forms mode that many have, where only form-related elements will be read out - this means that paragraphs of text and headings may not be available to screenreader users.<cite>Mathew Pennell</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting discussion on it can be read in the WSG archives on the <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg@webstandardsgroup.org/msg32998.html" rel="nofollow">Styling Forms</a> thread. Thierry Koblentz&#8217;s take on using the br element (Mike Cherim agrees) and Mike Cherim&#8217;s upcoming article on Screenreaders and form elements styling are worth looking into.</p>
<p>Personally I uses unordered lists, I wrap the label around the fieldname and not around the entire input&#8230; but there you go. Interesting how these things pan out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by steven</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-3</link>
		<author>steven</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Personally I'm actually not that sold on paragraphs... a list of form elements? I tend to use lists nowdays. But yes it means a little extra in the css.

Although I did use paragraphs before for the exact same reason as you're discussing. I have to admit its easier.

The issue really is that forms can be such a bastard to get right that I think what's lacking is a proper container. Neither list or paragraph make entire sense... and there's the sad old everything is a list argument I suppose.

I'm interested because I've felt like a bit of a cheap whore for a while now from using unordered lists to do my dirty work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;m actually not that sold on paragraphs&#8230; a list of form elements? I tend to use lists nowdays. But yes it means a little extra in the css.</p>
<p>Although I did use paragraphs before for the exact same reason as you&#8217;re discussing. I have to admit its easier.</p>
<p>The issue really is that forms can be such a bastard to get right that I think what&#8217;s lacking is a proper container. Neither list or paragraph make entire sense&#8230; and there&#8217;s the sad old everything is a list argument I suppose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested because I&#8217;ve felt like a bit of a cheap whore for a while now from using unordered lists to do my dirty work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List or Paragraph for Forms? by Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-2</link>
		<author>Jermayn Parker</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nortypig.com/2008/02/07/list-or-paragraph-for-forms/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>So what do you personally think???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do you personally think???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
